Journal Information
Vol. 33. Issue 3.
Pages 167-173 (July - September 2013)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 33. Issue 3.
Pages 167-173 (July - September 2013)
Review article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcol.2013.08.003
Open Access
Cylindrical abdominoperineal resection rationale, technique and controversies
Amputação abdominoperineal cilíndrica racional, técnica e controvérsias
Patricio B. Lynna, Angelita Habr-Gamaa, Rodrigo O. Pereza,b,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, Esteban Grzonac, Charles Sabbaghd, Joaquim J. Gama-Rodriguesa
a Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
b University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Gastroenterology Department, Colorectal Surgery Division, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
c Hospital Alemán de Buenos Aires, Surgery Division, Buenos Aires, Argentina
d Service de Chirurgie Viscérale et Digestive, Hôpital Nord, CHU d’Amiens, place Victor-Pauchet, France
Article information
Download PDF

Surgery remains the cornerstone in rectal cancer treatment. Abdominoperineal excision (APE), described more than 100 years ago, remains as an important procedure for the treatment of selected advanced distal tumors with direct invasion of the anal sphincter or preoperative fecal incontinence. Historically, oncological outcomes of patients undergoing APE have been worse when compared to sphincter preserving operations. More recently, it has been suggested that patients undergoing APE for distal rectal cancer are more likely to have positive circumferential resection margins and intraoperative perforation, known surrogate markers for local recurrence. Recently, an alternative approach known as “Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision” has been described in an effort to improve rates of circumferential margin positivity possibly resulting in better oncological outcomes compared to the standard procedure. The objective of this paper is to provide a technical description and compare available data of both Extralevator and Standard abdominal perineal excision techniques.

Rectal cancer
Total mesorectal excision
Abdominoperineal excision
Extralevator Abdominoperineal excision
Cilindric abdominoperineal excision

Um dos pilares mais importantes no tratamento do câncer de reto ainda é a ressecção cirúrgica. A amputação de reto, ou excisão abdomino-perineal do reto (APE), descrita há mais de 100 anos, continua sendo um procedimento importante para o tratamento de tumores retais distais que invadem o aparelho esfincteriano ou em casos de incontinência pré-operatória. Entretanto, os resultados oncológicos dos pacientes submetidos à APE são piores quando comparados com os pacientes submetidos a procedimentos com preservação esfincteriana. Recentemente, foi sugerido que os pacientes submetidos à APE por câncer de reto distal apresentam mais frequentemente margem radial positiva, assim como perfuração intraoperatória do tumor, fatos reconhecidamente associados à recidiva local. Uma nova técnica cirúrgica conhecida como “Amputação de reto extraelevador ou cilíndrica” tem sido descrita em um esforço para reduzir as taxas de margem radial positivas, sugerindo melhores resultados oncológicos quando comparada com o procedimento convencional. O objetivo deste trabalho é descrever a técnica deste procedimento e comparar seus resultados com os obtidos com a técnica convencional de acordo com a evidência disponível.

Câncer de reto
Excisão total do mesorreto
Amputação abdominoperineal
Amputação abdominoperineal extraelevador
Amputação cilíndrica
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Campos FG, Habr-Gama A, Nahas SC, Perez RO. Abdominoperineal excision: evolution of a centenary operation. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2012. pp. 844–53.
R.J. Heald, R.D. Ryall.
Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Lancet., 1 (1986), pp. 1479-1482
E. Rullier, C. Laurent, F. Bretagnol, A. Rullier, V. Vendrely, F. Zerbib.
Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule.
Ann. Surg., 241 (2005 Mar), pp. 465-469
E. Kapiteijn, C.A. Marijnen, I.D. Nagtegaal, H. Putter, W.H. Steup, T. Wiggers, et al.
Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer.
N. Engl. J. Med., 345 (2001), pp. 638-646
R.J. Heald, R.K. Smedh, A. Kald, R. Sexton, B.J. Moran.
Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum--an endangered operation.
Norman Nigro Lectureship. Diseases of the colon and rectum., 40 (1997 Jul), pp. 747-751
W.L. Law, K.W. Chu.
Abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcome.
Br J Surg., 91 (2004 Nov), pp. 1493-1499
R. Marr, K. Birbeck, J. Garvican, C.P. Macklin, N.J. Tiffin, W.J. Parsons, et al.
The Modern Abdominoperineal Excision.
Ann. Surg., 242 (2005 Jul), pp. 74-82
A. Wibe, B. Møller, J. Norstein, E. Carlsen, J.N. Wiig, R.J. Heald, et al.
A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer--implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway.
A national audit. Diseases of the colon and rectum., 45 (2002 Jul), pp. 857-866
Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, van Krieken JHJM, Quirke P, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, et al. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J. Clin. Oncol. [Internet]. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9257–64. Available from: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.
Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CAM, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJH, van Krieken JHJM, Pathology Review Committee, et al. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2002 Mar;26(3):350–7.
J.H. Pemberton.
How to treat the persistent perineal sinus after rectal excision.
Colorectal Dis., 5 (2003 Sep), pp. 486-489
P. Gervaz, P. Bucher, B. Konrad, P. Morel, S. Beyeler, L. Lataillade, et al.
A Prospective longitudinal evaluation of quality of life after abdominoperineal resection.
J Surg Oncol., 97 (2008), pp. 14-19
T. Holm, A. Ljung, T. Häggmark, G. Jurell, J. Lagergren.
Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.
Br J Surg., 94 (2007 Feb), pp. 232-238
R. Marr, K. Birbeck, J. Garvican, C.P. Macklin, N.J. Tiffin, W.J. Parsons, et al.
The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.
Ann. Surg., 242 (2005 Jul), pp. 74-82
I.D. Nagtegaal, P. Quirke.
What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J.
Clin. Oncol., 26 (2008), pp. 303-312
P. How, O. Shihab, P. Tekkis, G. Brown, P. Quirke, R. Heald, et al.
A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era.
Surg Oncol., 20 (2011 Dec), pp. e149-e155
Shihab OC, Heald RJ, Holm T, How PD, Brown G, Quirke P, et al. A Pictorial Description of Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer. Colorectal Disease. 2012 Jul;:no–no.
O.C. Shihab, P. How, N. West, C. George, U. Patel, P. Quirke, et al.
Can a novel MRI staging system for low rectal cancer aid surgical planning?.
Diseases of the colon and rectum., 54 (2011 Oct), pp. 1260-1264
West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJE, Holm T, Quirke P, European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg [Internet]. 2010 Feb 23;97(4):588–99. Available from: ode=ref&cmd=prlinks.
D.E. Messenger, Z. Cohen, R. Kirsch, B.I. O’Connor, J.C. Victor, H. Huang, et al.
Favorable pathologic and long-term outcomes from the conventional approach to abdominoperineal resection.
Diseases of the colon and rectum., 54 (2011 Jul), pp. 793-802
Stelzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H. Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer—a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 May 21;26(10):1227–40.
L.F. de Campos-Lobato, L. Stocchi, D.W. Dietz, I.C. Lavery, V.W. Fazio, M.F. Kalady.
Prone or Lithotomy Positioning During an Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer Results in Comparable Oncologic Outcomes.
Diseases of the colon and rectum., 54 (2011 Aug), pp. 939-946
Asplund D, Haglind E, Angenete E. Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery. Results from a single centre. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jan 4.
T. Welsch, V. Mategakis, P. Contin, Y. Kulu, M.W. Büchler, A. Ulrich.
Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications.
Int J Colorectal Dis., 28 (2012 Nov 21), pp. 503-510
P.G. Vaughan-Shaw, T. Cheung, J.S. Knight, P.H. Nichols, S.A. Pilkington, A.H. Mirnezami.
A prospective case–control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.
Tech Coloproctol., 16 (2012), pp. 355-362
B. Singh, G. Lloyd, P.J. Nilsson, S. Chaudhri.
Laparoscopic extralevator abdominal perineal excision of the rectum: the best of both worlds.
Tech Coloproctol., 16 (2011), pp. 73-75
Copyright © 2013. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
Journal of Coloproctology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.